Label / categorize sources

Give every source a label: 1. Editorial / Journalistic News sites, journalistic coverage, blogs run by editorial teams. Examples: CNN, NYT, TechCrunch, The Verge. 2. Corporate – Owned Media Corporate content created by the company/product itself. Includes commercial websites, online shops, and brand blogs. 3. Corporate – Competitor Media Corporate content from a competitor. 4. Corporate – Third-Party Blogs & Content Corporate blogs or content not owned by the target company, but still commercially driven. 5. Press Releases Press releases regardless of where they’re published. (Worth keeping separate since they’re a hybrid of corporate + news, but with distinct intent.) 6. Academic / Research Universities, research centers, journals, patents, arXiv. 7. Government / NGO Government (.gov, .eu, etc.), public agencies, NGOs, nonprofits. 8. UGC / Social User-generated content platforms and discussions. Includes Reddit, YouTube, TikTok, LinkedIn, Facebook. 9. Review Platforms Sites specialized in reviews, ratings, product comparisons. G2, Capterra, Trustpilot, Product Hunt. (Keep this as its own category—different from UGC even though user-driven.) 10. Aggregators / Reference Wikipedia, Britannica, Visual Capitalist, dictionaries. 11. Paid / Advertorial Sponsored content, native ads, landing pages with clear marketing intent. (Unique to your first list, keep it.) 12. Other Anything that doesn’t fit above.

Source Export: Separate columns per (competitor) brand

Hi Rankshift team, we’re having trouble parsing the brands in column I for our reporting tools. Is it possible to have a separate column per competitor brand? Right now we have to do it manually every time. Having this feature would allow us to automate reporting dashboards for clients, which makes our work a lot more scalable. Something that’s quite important. Thank you!

PR feature: Track specific coverage

Hi Rankshift team! Our PR team would love to have granular insights and track of how their PR work is affecting LLMs. This would allow them to prove a causal relation between coverage/press releases and increase of AI visibility of a brand. Feature request Could you add a feature that allows us to trace/enter a specific URL(s) of a newsarticle, to see if it’s listed as a source of a specific prompt? Having this feature would allow PR agencies to prove ROI, something that’s been historically almost impossible to do. (This would open the door for Rankshift to have a bigger market/target audience as well!)

LLM Traffic overview

Provide a dedicated dashboard summarizing all website traffic generated by Large Language Model (LLM) platforms such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude. This overview should give marketing and SEO teams a quick, actionable snapshot of how much traffic is being driven by AI search, what it’s doing on the site, and how it converts.

White label add-on for Agencies

Hi team would it be possible to have a white label add-on for agencies in Rankshift similar to how SEranking does their white label option? The white label feature would include: Tailoring the platform to your brand: custom colors, uploading a logo, and more. Use your own domain: Make the platform uniquely yours by configuring your personalized (sub)domain name New Project Member type: Client: read-only seats and granting customized access to areas of Rankshift. White label GEO reports

Removal of Prompt Answers

Allow the user to delete individual answers under a prompt. A warning will be shown that this could impact analysis results.

Recommendation share metric

Metric that goes beyond visibility, citations or sentiment. Does the AI model actually recommend you? And what is your share compared to other competitors that get recommended, over time? “There’s the citation where your webpage is mentioned. There’s the mention where you’ve got your brand in the response. But rarely is ChatGPT or Claude specifically saying, you should go with X.” That last step, the recommendation, is the one that pays, and it is the one prompt-tracking scores treat as the same thing as a footnote."

Brand accuracy metric

Score that measures whether the AI model describes your entity correctly at all. “If the model holds wrong facts about you, every downstream number is built on sand, because it is recommending, or refusing to recommend, a version of you that is not real.” Ideas: Rankshifts to recognize facts about your brand in prompt responses. You can manually check and verify these facts. Wrong facts can be flagged. For flagged facts, it would be nice if you (when applicable) could see the source that the fact is based on. Then a follow up action could be to have the source material changed. Other idea: You set up brand facts, kind of like a persona. When were you founded, where are you based, what do you sell, who do you compete against, etc. Rankshift to automatically flag wrong facts based on a mismatch between the prompt response and your ‘brand facts’

Export file (csv,...) with raw data

Maybe i overlooked it but i can’t find an option to export raw data with citations, mentions linked to tag groups. It’s handy to trow those in a premade AI analyser to get a first understanding what’s going on?

Switch projects

It would be nice if we could stay on the same section / page when switching projects instead of going to the main dashboard every time?

Brand groups

Brand groups to be used across multiple projects

Brand position

Average ranking of your brand in the answer (e.g., mentioned first, second, etc.). Visible in the dashboard, the prompts page and prompt detail pages.

Run a 1x time scenario run button

Would it be possible to add a 1x scenario button. Sometimes when I’m doing pitches, I only need to do a single scan of a project, not an urgent feature, but it would be a quality of life (QoL) request. Just a little thing that makes the tool more enjoyable.

Crawler logs

Provide a centralized dashboard to visualize and analyze search engine and AI bot crawling activity on the website. The dashboard should make it easy to identify which bots are visiting, how often they come, what pages they focus on, and how they interact with the site from a technical standpoint (status codes, crawl frequency, crawl distribution).

Looker Studio integration

Prompt Suggestions control

Better control how prompt suggestions are being generated. Sometimes, they are all branded. Steer prompt ideas based on keywords provided by the user. Provide the ability to generate more suggestions.

Automatically detect whether your brand or competitors are mentioned in sources

Get a more in-depth report on where your clients are being mentioned compared to their competitors, not just in AI responses you track but also in the articles on the web that are used as a source to feed these AI responses.

Source/Citation List Manager

Team, would it be able to have a Source/Citation List Manager? Like you would be able to select your favorite citation sources and "collect" them in a list for future use/action points? (kinda like Keyword Manager in SEO tools)

Brand name variations - option cluster data

We recently went through a light rebrand, adding both brand-name variants splits all data. Would be great if there would be an option to cluster data.

Pitch seats for agencies

Add “pitch seats” to allow agencies to temporarily track prompts for prospects during sales pitches, without affecting their regular subscription capacity.

Bulk edit prompts

Remove prompt Remove one or more tags Remove all tags